91 308 38 38
Clínica Rementería Academy

AGREEMENT AMONG ORBSCAN, PENTACAM AND IOL MASTER FOR THE CALCULATION OF POSTERIOR CHAMBER PHAKIC IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL) SIZE

AGREEMENT AMONG ORBSCAN, PENTACAM AND IOL MASTER FOR THE CALCULATION OF POSTERIOR CHAMBER PHAKIC IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL) SIZE.

Autores: Vanesa Blázquez, OD PhD; Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez, MD, PhD; Jorge García-Pérez, MD, PhD ; Juan Gros-Otero, MD, PhD; Inés Contreras Martín,MD, PhD; Laureano Álvarez-Rementería Capelo, MD. Clínica Rementería Madrid

INTRODUCTION

Successfull ICL implantation is likely related to an accurate prediction of refraction and ICL vault. An appropriate ICL vault is critical for preventing major postoperative adverse effects1:

  • Overestimation: angle-closure glaucoma, pigment dispersion syndrome, endothelial cell loss.
  • Underestimation: anterior subcapsular cataract

Parameters to evaluate: White-to-White (WTW) 1 or Sulcus-to-Sulcus 2,3 distance and Anterior chamber depth (ACD)

ICL sizing using sulcus-to-sulcus distance seems to be more accurate than WTW methods. 4

Different methods: topography, tomography, biometry, caliper, corneal gauge. Recommended by the manufacturer: Orbscan II.

PURPOSE

To compare the agreement among the measurements obtained with Orbscan IIz, Pentacam and IOL Master during the preoperative exam performed to calculate the ICL size.

METHODS

  • Retrospective, observational, non-comparative study of 21 eyes of 11 patients
  • Preoperative complete ocular examination (WTW, ACD): Orbscan Iiz ,Pentacam, IOL Master
  • Visian ICL V4c model
  • In all cases, WTW obtained with Orbscan (gold standard) was used for the calculation of ICL size
  • Central Vault and distance from the endothelium to anterior surface of ICL were measured 1 month postop with AS-OCT.
  • We compared the ICL size that would have been implanted using the measurements obtained with Pentacam and IOL Master.

RESULTS

 

Parameters Mean ± SD (Range)
Age (yrs) 30.16 ± 5.2 (23 to 40)
SE (D) -9.67 ± 3.4 (-5.25 to -20.50)
Mean keratometry (D) 45.26 ± 1.3 (43.00 to 47.45)
Horizontal WTW (mm)  
Orbscan 11.58 ± 0.4 (10.90 to 12)
Pentacam 11.63 ± 0.2 (11.01 to 12.10)
IOL Master 12.14 ± 0.4 (11.50 to 12.70)
ACD (mm)  
Orbscan 3.18 ± 0.1 (2.95 to 3.53)
Pentacam 3.28 ± 0.2 (3.02 to 3.66)
IOL Master 3.22 ± 0.2 (2.98 to 3.61)
Vault (mm) 0.55 ± 0.2 (0.27 to 0.72)
Endothelium-ICL distance (mm) 2.46 ± 0.2 (2.29 to 2.69)

 

INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (ICC)
Horizontal WTW ACD
ORBSCAN-PENTACAM 0.96 (0.83 to 0.99) 0.85 (0.71 to 0.92)
ORBSCAN-IOL MASTER 0.57 (0.41 to 0.63) 0.87 (0.69 to 0.91)

 

figura_1

CONCLUSION

Measurements obtained with Orbscan II and Pentacam show a very high agreement for the calculation of ICL size.

IOL Master tends to overestimate ICL size compared to Orbscan.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Lee DH et al. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 272-277.
  2. Oh J et al. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1685-1688.
  3. Kim KH et al. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:632-637.
  4. Reinstein DZ et al. J Refract Surg 2013; 29:30-35
¡Comparte Rementería!

Eduardo

Autor

Ver más artículos

Deja un comentario